Welcome Guest.

14Answers

Samsung A9 Star phone worth buying?

Asked by: Deborah Morgan 227 views Phone & Tablet September 15, 2018

Remarks: Everyone has their own hobbies, so please don't post the answer "Recommended to buy a domestic mobile phone", thank you!

14 Answers

  1. +7Votes  

    Not worth it, although a9 supports Dolby sound, and is equipped with amoled screen, this is just its highlight, but the processor is only Qualcomm450 (625 down version), the battery capacity is too small, does not meet the needs of the people, if Everyday playing games is like the situation of the Jedi survival glory will be stuck or even stuck, and the battery life will be very poor, but the price of two thousand files may consider the millet 8se, the Snapdragon 710 is also a Samsung a screen, and the rear The main camera is Sony IMX363, which supports dual pd focusing 1.4μm large pixels. This CMOS is also mounted on Xiaomi 8, and the Xiaomi 8DxOMark score is higher than iPhone X. You don’t have to worry about taking pictures. (Self-timer 20 million The nighttime automatic synthesis of 1.8μm large pixels) The processor 10nm battery is larger than the a9, so the battery life is no problem. Money can be directly on Meizu 16, Xiaolong 845, high value even photos and performance is also very powerful glory 10 and glory play can be included in the scope of consideration

    Stephanie Edwards- September 15, 2018 |

  2. +6Votes  

    I feel that Huawei is not worse than Samsung

    Stephanie- September 15, 2018 |

  3. +8Votes  

    I think Samsung wants to buy a flagship, or it will be made in China~

    Gregory Clark- September 16, 2018 |

  4. +6Votes  

    I personally feel that Samsung’s price/performance ratio is not high

    George Moore- September 16, 2018 |

  5. +3Votes  

    Samsung to China The quality of mobile phones is not too good

    Shirley- September 17, 2018 |

  6. +1Votes  

    With the improvement of the quality of domestic mobile phones, Samsung mobile phones are not in the price, quality, reputation, etc. The key is to look at your own I like to choose my own.

    Elizabeth Robinson- September 17, 2018 |

  7. +1Votes  

    Sure not to buy···Samsung is too outdated. ·Now the domestic machine is much better than him.··

    Young- September 17, 2018 |

  8. +8Votes  

    This depends on your needs.

    Amanda Roberts- September 17, 2018 |

  9. +3Votes  

    It’s not worthwhile to configure from the phone itself unless it’s not worth 2,000 yuan to buy a phone with Qualcomm 450 processor (low-end entry-level processor can’t eat chicken king) Reluctantly play) Unless you buy this phone just to watch the video (Samsung A-screen panoramic Dolby sound is the only brightness of this phone) Send a message to see if the vibrato does not play the game, as long as the price of the game is at least a price to buy a configuration Qualcomm 660 Start-up mobile phone

    Christopher Lee- September 17, 2018 |

  10. +7Votes  

    Samsung can be considered a little bit apart from the S and NOTE series. Others don’t need to be considered

    Sharon- September 17, 2018 |

  11. +3Votes  

    It can be said that if you are a Samsung fan, Or fancy Samsung’s system optimization is OK, then you buy a9 star.

    But objective analysis, A9 star is not cost-effective. After all, Samsung is a high-end mobile phone brand, and his low-end series is sure to shrink on the basis of high-end. It’s like the feeling of a 200,000 BMW car.

    Because the cpu of Samsung A9 STAR is Snapdragon 660, I don’t think you will watch it. Since you choose such a cpu, it means that you still don’t play games very much. Then I have to say that it is better to buy a mobile phone such as VIVO X21, Tmall 2498 yuan or 6G running memory, cpu is Snapdragon 660 artificial intelligence version, more than 660 than Samsung’s AI chip, can complete some artificial intelligence things, such as jovi assistant.

    And, compared to the face value, A9 STAR is lost to VIVO X21, X21 frame is very narrow, and the screen material of X21 is the same as A9 STAR is Samsung’s own super AMOLED, the contrast is very high. The color is very bright.

    In terms of taking pictures, I personally think that Samsung is still excellent, but VIVO also works well by optimizing its own algorithms.

    The key is that VIVO is cheaper than 500, and it still has 6GB of running memory and 2G more than A9.

    Answer: If you have a performance requirement, it is not a face value. Ok, then I don’t recommend VIVO.
    Huawei glory note10, the value is not VIVO high, but the battery is mostly, the cpu is much better is the Kirin 970, and the 骁 835 a level (previous VIVO and Samsung is 骁 660..), but the disadvantage is low value, The screen is AMOLED, not super AMOLED. Others have no shortcomings, and the photo should be a level with VIVO, slightly weaker than Samsung.
    Also recommended is Meizu 16, camera and Samsung almost, cpu is 骁 845 ****, price 2700 yuan *** 颜 value is also very high, but the short board is too low battery.
    There is also a plus 6 is also very good, the camera can also compare with Samsung, cpu is also Xiaolong 845, there is no short board in each aspect

    Answer: Upstairs began to copy and paste the post a few months ago. . .

    Shirley- September 17, 2018 |

  12. +1Votes  

    Domestic mobile phone is as good

    Virginia- September 17, 2018 |

  13. +3Votes  

    Personal does not recommend Samsung or Huawei

    Mark- September 18, 2018 |

  14. +6Votes  

    Samsung A9 Star core selling point is mainly good Photo experience, solid workmanship, and high value, first-line brands. The downside is that although the price is not more expensive than OV, it is much more expensive than most of the Snapdragon 660 mobile phones this year. The high price/performance ratio is the biggest bottleneck restricting its sales volume

    James Adams- September 18, 2018 |